Staatic vs security plugins and managed hosts
Firewalls filter attacks and managed hosts patch fast, but WordPress still answers every visitor. See how a static public site compares, and when the alternatives fit better.
Most WordPress sites are protected in one of two ways: a security plugin or firewall that filters requests before they reach vulnerable code, or a managed host that patches, scans and blocks on your behalf. Both keep WordPress itself answering every visitor.
Staatic takes a different route. Visitors get finished pages, and your WordPress moves somewhere they can't reach. The comparisons below show what that changes, and where the other options are still the better fit.
Security plugins and web application firewalls inspect incoming requests and block the ones that look like an attack. That works when a rule exists for the attack. In 2025, 46% of new WordPress vulnerabilities had no fix on the day they went public, and the most targeted ones were attacked a median of 5 hours after disclosure.1 In one vendor test, standard hosting defences blocked only 26% of WordPress attacks.1
For example Wordfence, Patchstack, Sucuri or a host WAF
Static public site, private WordPress
They also work together. Many teams keep a security plugin on their private WordPress for login protection and scanning, while Staatic takes the public site out of the line of fire.
Managed WordPress hosts take care of the server, caching, backups and often a firewall. Your site still runs WordPress live for every visitor, behind a page cache. When a WordPress flaw is published, the host has to block or patch it fast enough on your behalf.
Live WordPress behind a page cache
Managed private WordPress plus a static public site
If most of your site is built per visitor, such as a web shop with accounts, a membership site or a forum, a static public site covers only part of it. Keep those features on a dynamic setup, or forward just those paths with origin rules. The compatibility overview shows where each feature fits.